Delhi NCT Bill 2021: Murder of democracy and  negation of peoples’ will

The Government of the National Capital Territory ( NCT) of Delhi (Amendment ) Bill 2021 passed by the Lok Sabha on March 20 and the Rajya Sabha on March 24 confers absolute powers on the Central Government-appointed Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, which even Mughal Emperors may not have enjoyed. The Bill is in conflict with Article 239AA of the Constitution of India, the July 4, 2018 ruling of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India and the basic principle of cooperative federalism enshrined in the Constitution.

With one stroke of the pen the Bill reduces the Council of Ministers and Legislative Assembly of Delhi to mere talking shops without any   legislative or executive powers. The Bill gives absolute powers to the LG by declaring him/her to be “the Government of Delhi.”

 

It provides that the opinion of the LG shall be obtained on all such matters as may be specified by the LG, before taking any executive action on decisions of the Council of Ministers of the Delhi Government. It curbs the Delhi Assembly’s power even to conduct its own business as per the rules of procedure made by it.

The Bill also prohibits the Legislative Assembly from making any rule to enable itself or its committees to (a) consider the matters of day-to-day administration of the NCT of Delhi and (b) conduct any enquiry in relation to administrative decisions. Further, any provision in force having the above said effect will be void. The bill as a last nail on the coffin provides that the opinion of the LG must be obtained before taking any executive action on decisions of Delhi Government, on such matters as may be specified by the LG!

Also read:  Challenges of student learning 25 years from now

 

In this context this columnist is reminded of the words of socialist leader H.V.Kamath  at the inaugural meeting of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) at the Vithal Bhai Patel House during the Internal Emergency. Speaking  about the infamous 42 Constitution  Amendment brought by the Central Government , Kamth said  “ They are not amending the Constitution, they are not mending it, they are ending it.”

Ironically, the Bill also effectively circumvents  the  4 July 2018 ruling of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India, comprising the then Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M.Khnwilkar, DY Chndrachud and Ashok Bhasin.

In the Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court had ruled “the LG is an administrative head in the limited sense, and is not a Governor. The LG had no independent decision making powers. He is bound by the aid and advise of Delhi Chief Minister headed-Council of Ministers of the NCT Government of Delhi on all matters except those pertaining to police, public order and land.

 

The Supreme Court had also observed that the elected representatives and the Council of Ministers of Delhi, being accountable to the voters of Delhi, must have appropriate powers so as to perform their functions effectively and efficiently.”

The Supreme Court had also pointed out that “the exercise of establishing a democratic and representative form of government for NCT Delhi by insertion of Articles 239 AA and 239 AB would turn futile if the Government of Delhi that enjoys the confidence of the people of Delhi is not able to usher in policies and laws over which the Delhi Legislative Assembly has power to legislate for the NCT of Delhi.”

Also read:  Act of God or Himalayan Blunder?

The Supreme Court had also ruled the L.G still had the right to seek the President’s opinion in case of a disagreement between him/her and the government of Delhi. The president who is bound by the aid and advice of the Prime Minister headed Union Cabinet of Ministers would be the final authority in case of a conflict, with his or her opinion binding on both the LG and the Delhi Government. The SC cautioned the LG to use this power only in exceptional circumstances and not in a “routine or mechanical manner”.

Significantly, the Supreme Court also ruled that “ THERE IS NO ROOM FOR  ABSOLUTISM AND THERE IS NO ROOM FOR ANARCHISM ALSO”, in the governance of National Capital Territory of Delhi. The Court also pointed out that although Delhi had a special status, it was not a state, hence unlike state governors the LG was not a mere constitutional figurehead, but also bore the title of administrator.

 

With such a detailed ruling by the constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India on the powers of the LG and the elected government in Delhi, there was actually no ambiguity at all about anyone’s role in the governance of Delhi.

 

Defending the Bill in Parliament BJP MP Bhupender Yadav said the Bill is in line with General Clauses Act 1897. The purpose of the General Clauses Act 1897 was: a) to avoid  superfluity, b) to shorten the Central Acts, c) to give definition of terms in common use. Superb defence by Ydav! The Government of the National Capital Territory has been redefined in the Bill as the LG.  Nothing, not even leaf can move without his or her knowledge or consent. Everyone, the elected Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers, the members of the Legislative Assembly and even the people will be responsible to the LG.

Also read:  Republic Day ban on Sree Narayana Guru

Under the Constitution of independent India, Delhi became a Part C State,  that is a political unit that enjoyed the least amount of autonomy from Central control and supervision. In 1956 when the States Reorganisation Commission abolished Part C states Delhi became a Union Territory. And from1956 to 1967 the only popularly elected body in Delhi was the Delhi Municipal Corporation.

In 1966, a Metropolitan Council was installed in Delhi. An interim Council was appointed by the Central Government. Elections were held early in 1967 along with the general elections. Unlike the Municipal Corporation, the Metropolitan Council covered the whole of Delhi. The Council was essentially a forum for debate. It had no legislative or executive powers. The real authority in the Union Territory was the LG.

The BJP will do well to remember that it was the Jan Sangh in the 1960s and 1970s that demanded statehood for Delhi. In fact, following the victory of the Janata Party, the then Convener of the Janata Party in Delhi , V.K.Malhotra,  declared that his party was committed to statehood for Delhi. The BJP is frittering away the fruits of years struggle by people who came before them to replace peoples mandate through absolute rule.